Tramping aobut the web is FUN!!
- Sapper-FIN
- Post Maniac 2nd Grade
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:14 am
- Location: Finland
- :FI:Sneaky_Russian
- Post Maniac General
- Posts: 3118
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:02 am
- Location: London SE. Untied Kingdom
- Contact:
more of the wierd and wonderful -

"The marksman hitteth the target partly by pulling, partly by letting go. The boatsman reacheth the landing partly by pulling, partly by letting go." (Egyptian proverb)
- :FI:Heloego
- Post Maniac General
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 9:40 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA (Smile when you say that!)
The Russian Mustang...
...is a P-51B with the Allison Engine.
The -C had the same engine, but was fitted with a Malcolm Hood (the dome plexiglass canopy).
Both the -B and -C were Lend-Lease aircraft, the -B sent to the Soviets, while the Brits used the -C. The USAAF didn't care for the poor performance at altitude, as the current philosophy here was to build for high altitude and high speed. So they were passed off to allied forces before we even joined the War.
The Soviets, however, found it to be a satisfactory low-level fighter, with good low-altitude performance. It fitted well with their preference for low-altitude fighting.
It was not a common aircraft, as relatively few were built, and the Soviet pilots preferred the P-39 due to it's heavier firepower. The centerline cannon did have a certain appeal.
I don't recall ever hearing/reading about production dive brakes fitted to a P-51, though field mods were very common.
The -C had the same engine, but was fitted with a Malcolm Hood (the dome plexiglass canopy).
Both the -B and -C were Lend-Lease aircraft, the -B sent to the Soviets, while the Brits used the -C. The USAAF didn't care for the poor performance at altitude, as the current philosophy here was to build for high altitude and high speed. So they were passed off to allied forces before we even joined the War.
The Soviets, however, found it to be a satisfactory low-level fighter, with good low-altitude performance. It fitted well with their preference for low-altitude fighting.
It was not a common aircraft, as relatively few were built, and the Soviet pilots preferred the P-39 due to it's heavier firepower. The centerline cannon did have a certain appeal.
I don't recall ever hearing/reading about production dive brakes fitted to a P-51, though field mods were very common.

Last edited by :FI:Heloego on Sat Mar 18, 2006 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
...and wear your feckin' mask!!!!! 

- :FI:Sneaky_Russian
- Post Maniac General
- Posts: 3118
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:02 am
- Location: London SE. Untied Kingdom
- Contact:
- Baderslegs
- Postmaster
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 6:00 pm
- Location: Strathclyde,Scotland U.K.
- :FI:WillieOFS
- Post Maniac 1st Grade
- Posts: 1831
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 4:17 pm
- Location: 65 MI NE of DUBLIN (TX)
- Contact: